ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Content, timing, participants and documented outcomes of family meetings in a specialist palliative care unit in Portugal: a retrospective descriptive study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily meetings are a core communication strategy in palliative care, but their content in routine clinical practice remains insufficiently described. This study aimed to characterize the timing, participants, goals, problems identified, and decisions reached in family meetings conducted in a specialist palliative care unit.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study of all formally documented family meetings held in a certified palliative care unit in Portugal between October 2012 and December 2019. Data were extracted from standardized meeting records and electronic health records. Variables included patient characteristics, Palliative Performance Scale scores, meeting timing, participants, goals, problems identified, and final decisions. Free-text entries were thematically recoded when needed. Descriptive statistics were used.
resultsA total of 272 formally documented family meeting records were analysed. The unit of analysis was the meeting record. Physicians attended 99.3% of meetings, nurses 65.4%, social workers 45.2%, psychologists 23.5%, and patients 11.4%. The median time from admission to meeting was 9 days, and the median time from meeting to death was 13 days. Median Palliative Performance Scale score declined from 40% at admission to 30% at the meeting. Discharge after the meeting occurred in 84 records (30.9%). Common goals included clarifying expectations, building rapport, and discussing therapeutic options. Frequently identified problems concerned prognosis, symptoms, adequacy of clinical information, end-of-life issues, and discharge planning. Common decisions related to psychological or social support, discharge planning, comfort-focused care, and symptom management.
conclusionsFamily meetings provided a structured forum for communication, problem identification, and care planning across clinical and psychosocial domains. Their late timing and low patient participation suggest that earlier implementation and broader interdisciplinary involvement may strengthen patient- and family-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.