ArticleBMC health services research2026
"It's not easy, but we need to support them so they don't get tired on the way": provider perspectives on delivering HIV services for people returning to HIV care in Cape Town, South Africa.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with HIV who interrupt treatment often face challenges when re-engaging in care and remain at risk for future interruptions. Understanding the provider perspective on the healthcare context in which re-engagement occurs is essential for designing effective and scalable support interventions. We aimed to characterize the implementation context for re-engaging in HIV care in Cape Town, South Africa, with a view to inform the design of future interventions in this setting.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with nurses (n = 5), counsellors (n = 3) and administrative clerks (n = 3) at two public-sector health facilities. Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the inner setting of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), including structural characteristics, organizational culture, relational dynamics, and communication.
resultsWe identified compounding and interconnected challenges within the CFIR inner setting. Limited staffing and fragmented clinic organization contributed to delays and frustration for both clients of HIV services and providers, reinforcing negative client-provider interactions. Despite valuing person-centred care, providers struggled to uphold these principles amid high workloads and systemic pressures relating to physical, information system, and human resource infrastructure limitations. Additionally, a cross-cutting theme was the challenge of inter-facility transfers, driven by geographic mobility and stigmatizing clinic interactions. Difficulties in linking client information across clinics intersected with the structural and relational barriers, adding another layer of complexity to providing supportive care for people returning to HIV services.
conclusionsProviders in this context were empathetic but layered inner setting barriers made it challenging to provide person-centred care. Addressing these challenges requires interventions that not only accommodate the changing life circumstances of people living with HIV but crucially facility- and system-level changes to support the providers and their working environments, which together will foster strong reciprocal client-provider relationships. Future interventions must prioritize strengthening staffing and workload capacity, physical infrastructure, and information systems alongside simplified, responsive service delivery models to ease the path back into care for people living with HIV and their providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.