ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Factors influencing obstetricians' intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpontaneous vaginal birth is the preferred mode of birth for most women, however, increasing intervention has decreased rates, especially for nulliparous women. Obstetricians are identified as key stakeholders in intrapartum care, however very few studies have focused on the role obstetricians' intentions, attitudes and behaviours may have on mode of physiological birth. The purpose of this study was to explore factors influencing the intentions of obstetricians to facilitate normal physiological birth.
methodsThis qualitative study was underpinned by the Theory of Planned Behaviour. All participants were obstetricians, registered and practising within Australia, and had experience providing care to birthing women who met the 'selected primipara' criteria. Semi structured interviews were conducted with eight obstetricians representing various models of care across most States and Territories of Australia. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsTwo key themes were identified from the data, with three sub-themes nested within each. Theme 1 identified the 'Knowledge and beliefs' influencing participants intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth, including 'Definitions and nomenclature', 'Knowledge acquisition', and 'Communication and litigation'. Theme 2 identified 'External influences' impacting participants intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth and included 'Colleagues', 'Structures - policy, resources and models of care', and 'Women and the Community'.
conclusionsWhile obstetricians aimed to support the enabling of normal physiological birth, their intentions were influenced by many factors. Facilitating interdisciplinary interactions and education, embedding woman-centred care and promoting midwives' autonomy and full scope of practice would further alleviate known barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.