ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Repeatability and reproducibility of APT and GluCEST imaging at 5 T: phantom validation and clinical evaluation in patients with brain tumors.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of amide proton transfer (APT) and glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) imaging at 5 T and to investigate their clinical value in patients with brain tumors.
methodsPhantom experiments under varying pH conditions and bovine serum albumin (BSA) concentrations were performed to assess the within-session repeatability, between-session and between-day reproducibility of APT and GluCEST measurements using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), mean absolute difference, coefficient of repeatability (CoR) and coefficient of variation (CV). In vivo APT and GluCEST imaging was performed in 96 patients with brain tumors. Intra- and inter-observer agreements of APTmean and GluCESTmean measurements were evaluated using ICCs and Bland-Altman analysis across tumor, peritumoral edema, and normal brain tissue regions. Quantitative tumor-region APT and GluCEST metrics (APT/GluCESTmean, APT/GluCEST difference, and APT/GluCEST change ratio) were compared among major tumor subtypes using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade gliomas from low-grade gliomas.
resultsIn phantom studies, both APT and GluCEST demonstrated robust repeatability and reproducibility with high ICCs (> 0.96) and low mean absolute difference, CoR and CV. Both APT and GluCEST-weighted signals showed nonlinear pH-dependent changes and increased with higher BSA concentrations. In patients, intra- and inter-observer agreements were excellent for APTmean and GluCESTmean in tumor, peritumoral edema, and normal brain regions (ICCs > 0.93). Tumor and peritumoral edema regions showed higher APT and GluCEST values than normal brain tissue (p < 0.05). After multiple-comparison correction, high-grade gliomas showed significantly higher APTmean, APT difference, GluCESTmean, GluCEST difference and GluCEST change ratio than low-grade gliomas. GluCEST-derived metrics showed favorable performance for glioma grading, with GluCEST change ratio achieving the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846, followed by GluCEST difference (AUC = 0.838) and GluCESTmean (AUC = 0.836).
conclusionAPT and GluCEST imaging at 5 T showed excellent repeatability and reproducibility in phantom experiments and robust measurement agreement in patients with brain tumors. APT and GluCEST measurements demonstrated subtype-related differences, and GluCEST-derived metrics showed favorable performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.