ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
CardioMetaHybridOptimizer as a behaviorally adaptive multi-phase metaheuristic framework for interpretable cardiovascular disease diagnosis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease prediction is delayed by high-dimensional clinical data and heteroginity. There is a need for decision-support system that can select relevant features. We propose a Cardio Meta Hybrid Optimizer (CMHO) framework designed to enhance feature selection and predictive accuracy in cardiac risk assessment.The CMHO framework integrates three metaheuristic algorithms-Lion Optimization (LO), Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), and Manta Ray Foraging Optimization (MRFO)-enhanced with adaptive switching, dynamic mutation, and iterative local search (ILS). The framework was evaluated on five benchmark datasets: Cleveland, Hungarian, Statlog, Switzerland, and Long Beach VA. We uesd a CNN-LSTM architecture for classification, validated through stratified tenfold cross-validation with 10 independent repetitions. Performance was benchmarked against RFE, GA, PSO, GWO, and Lasso using ANOVA to confirm statistical significance. The CMHO-integrated CNN-LSTM model achieved a accuracy of 96.1%, outperforming traditional feature selection methods by 3%-5% (p < 0.05). The framework demonstrated stability and clinical interpretability by selecting validated biomarkers-including thalassemia, chest pain type, and maximum heart rate-with a Stability Selection Index (SSI) > 0.90.The CMHO framework provides a robust and interpretable tool for cardiovascular risk assessment. By navigating high-dimensional data across diverse populations, it offers a reliable computational approach for clinical decision support in cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.