ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Coaches' perspectives on training quality in elite para-sport: a qualitative study of coach-athlete collaboration.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining quality is essential for performance development among elite para-athletes. Despite coaches' central role in structuring and adapting training, little research has explored their perspectives on what constitutes high-quality training. This study investigates which factors elite para-sport coaches perceive as important for achieving high training quality in daily practice.
methodsEight Norwegian coaches with experience at the Paralympic and World Championship level participated in semi-structured interviews. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to identify shared meanings across coaches' lived experiences.
resultsFour overarching themes emerged as central to training quality: (1) a supportive training environment (including adapted facilities and integrated support teams), (2) organization and adaptation of the training process (emphasizing collaborative planning and load management), (3) coaches' understanding of the athlete and sport (highlighting impairment-specific and sport competence), and (4) athlete ownership of training (fostering autonomy and responsibility). These factors were interrelated and influenced both the long-term training process and individual sessions. Coaches described training quality as a dynamic outcome of collaboration between coach, athlete, and support staff, involving continuous dialogue, real-time adjustments, and shared decision-making.
conclusionElite para-sport coaches perceive training quality as a multifaceted and collaborative process. Key contributions include a well-adapted environment, flexible planning, individualized understanding of athlete needs, and athlete engagement. These findings offer practical insights for enhancing coaching practices in para-sport and underscore the importance of coach-athlete-support team synergy in optimizing performance and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.