Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265565›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

Coaches' perspectives on training quality in elite para-sport: a qualitative study of coach-athlete collaboration.

Vemund Øvstehage, Jan Kocbach, Cecilia Severin, Knut Skovereng, Silvana Bucher Sandbakk, Øyvind Sandbakk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vemund ØvstehageCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. vemund.ovstehage@ntnu.no.
Jan KocbachCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Cecilia SeverinCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Knut SkoverengCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Silvana Bucher SandbakkDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Øyvind SandbakkSchool of Sport Science, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraining quality is essential for performance development among elite para-athletes. Despite coaches' central role in structuring and adapting training, little research has explored their perspectives on what constitutes high-quality training. This study investigates which factors elite para-sport coaches perceive as important for achieving high training quality in daily practice.

methodsEight Norwegian coaches with experience at the Paralympic and World Championship level participated in semi-structured interviews. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to identify shared meanings across coaches' lived experiences.

resultsFour overarching themes emerged as central to training quality: (1) a supportive training environment (including adapted facilities and integrated support teams), (2) organization and adaptation of the training process (emphasizing collaborative planning and load management), (3) coaches' understanding of the athlete and sport (highlighting impairment-specific and sport competence), and (4) athlete ownership of training (fostering autonomy and responsibility). These factors were interrelated and influenced both the long-term training process and individual sessions. Coaches described training quality as a dynamic outcome of collaboration between coach, athlete, and support staff, involving continuous dialogue, real-time adjustments, and shared decision-making.

conclusionElite para-sport coaches perceive training quality as a multifaceted and collaborative process. Key contributions include a well-adapted environment, flexible planning, individualized understanding of athlete needs, and athlete engagement. These findings offer practical insights for enhancing coaching practices in para-sport and underscore the importance of coach-athlete-support team synergy in optimizing performance and well-being.

Indexed as

DisabilityImpairmentPara-athletesParalympicsSport performanceTraining process

Identifiers

PMID42265565
PMCPMC13520284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.