ArticleThrombosis journal2026
Outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without heart failure on oral anticoagulants: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulticenter real-world data on anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) remain limited, particularly in Chinese populations. This study compared clinical outcomes in AF patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) according to HF status.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across four hospitals in China and included 4,878 AF patients who received OACs after discharge between January 2019 and August 2023. Patients were classified into HF (n = 2,371) and non-HF (n = 2,507) groups and followed for a median of 19 months. a. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations between HF and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was to matched HF and no-HF cohorts and to compare rivaroxaban with warfarin among patients with HF.
resultsAfter multivariable adjustment, HF was independently associated with higher risk of all-cause death(adjusted OR 1.414, 95% CI 1.118-1.787; P = 0.004), and not significantly different in risks of total bleeding, major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, minor bleeding, thrombosis, or ischemic stroke compare with non-HF. After 1:1 PSM, HF remained associated with higher risk of all-cause death. In the matched HF subgroup, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of all-cause death than warfarin (OR 0.619, 95% CI 0.422-0.907; P = 0.014).
conclusionAmong AF patients receiving OACs, concomitant HF was associated with increased risk of all-cause death. In the matched HF subgroup, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of all-cause death than warfarin. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective observational design and the lack of INR and time-in-therapeutic-range data for warfarin-treated patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.