Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265532›Full record

ReviewFamily process2026

Relational Memory Reconsolidation: A New Lens on Change Mechanisms in EFT for Couples.

Avishai Ella, Eran Bar-Kalifa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Avishai EllaThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9831-5875
Eran Bar-KalifaBen-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-3015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a new framework to account for change mechanisms in Emotion-Focused Therapy for Couples (EFT). Building on Lane et al.'s (2015) integrated memory model, the Relational Memory Reconsolidation model described here posits that EFT reshapes partners' relational memory structures through emotionally intense moments of expressed vulnerability and responsiveness. These vulnerability-responsiveness events allow partners to access and transform memories of past relational experiences (i.e., episodic memory) as well as associated beliefs about themselves and the relationship (i.e., semantic memory). This process of emotional activation and reconsolidation allows maladaptive interaction patterns, which are rigid and stressful, to evolve into more adaptive, emotionally responsive exchanges. These emotional moments activate and transform relational self-states that are responsive to interpersonal cues and can shape partners' self-concepts in a relational context. As therapy progresses and emotionally significant interactions are repeated, the coactivation of adaptive and maladaptive self-states updates neocortical memory traces, leading to changes in higher-order relational semantic structures (i.e., the relational self). These moments foster alignment in partners' perceptions of their shared reality, characterized by mutuality in feelings, practices, memories, goals, and identity. Clinically, the framework highlights the need to elicit one partner's core vulnerable emotions and, within the reconsolidation window, disconfirm related expectations (e.g., rejection) through the other partner's empathic and supportive response. This process may transform key components of partners' relational memory, including relational episodic memories, semantic structures, and procedural emotional responses.

Indexed as

Couples TherapyEmotion-Focused TherapyInterpersonal RelationsMemory ConsolidationEmotionsHumansMaleMemoryMemory, EpisodicModels, PsychologicalSelf Conceptcouple therapyEFTmemory reconsolidationrelational selfshared reality

Identifiers

PMID42265532
PMCPMC13249789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.