ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Families and Choice: Disassembling Same-Sex Families with Children.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the proliferation of same-sex families, same-sex separation has expanded, creating diverse parenthood-related issues. Yet, little is known about how these family dissolutions are perceived and enacted by parents and children. This article reports on a descriptive qualitative study under the constructive phenomenological approach conducted in Israel that explores the disassembling of families of choice and its impact on involved parties. The study examined choice as construed in 20 cases, narrated in 18 interviews with lesbian and gay separated parents, supplemented by two case outlines from a psychotherapist treating separated gay couples with children. Three major themes emerged: parents choose parents; children choose parents; and parents choose children. The study reveals how genetic relatedness was taken for granted as the most solid basis for parenthood, granting parents greatest privileges and widest choice range. However, it also shows that the prominence of genetic relatedness surfaced when relationships deteriorated. Legal parenthood provided another solid foundation, going nearly unchallenged through separation. Social parenting proved the most uncertain, where parents lacked genetic or legal ties and contributed "solely" to childrearing. Despite these complexities, separated couples aspired to create families that would be largely considered normative by local middle-class terms, while maintaining tight relations with their families of origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.