ArticleOdontology2026
Initial effect of dental loupe use on laminate veneer preparation accuracy: an in vitro 3D digital assessment.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the initial effect of dental loupe use on the 3D accuracy of laminate veneer preparations performed by prosthodontic specialty residents under standardized in vitro conditions. Twenty-six residents completed two maxillary right central incisor (#11) typodont preparations using a within-participant fixed-order protocol (unaided vision followed by loupes). Prepared specimens were scanned, anonymized, and compared with a criterion reference preparation using Geomagic Control X-based 3D metrology analysis. The primary 3D accuracy outcome was root mean square (RMS) deviation across five regions of interest: the full prepared surface, cervical, middle, and incisal thirds, and a 0.5-mm marginal band. Average signed deviation (Avg) was used as a secondary descriptive measure to characterize the direction of preparation errors. No statistically significant differences were found between loupe-assisted and unaided preparations for RMS outcomes (all p > 0.05). Avg analysis showed a similar directional pattern under both conditions, with a tendency toward over-reduction in the cervical, middle, and marginal regions and under-reduction in the incisal region. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, immediate loupe introduction without an extended adaptation period did not significantly improve RMS-based laminate veneer preparation accuracy compared with unaided vision. In addition, Avg analysis showed no clear change in the directional pattern of preparation errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42265498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.