ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Multiomics integration prioritizes potential drug targets for lung cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo provide more treatment options for patients with advanced lung cancer, this study aims to identify new therapeutic drug targets via the integration and analysis of multi-omics datasets.
methodsIn this study, we performed MR and co-localization analysis to identify candidate drug targets associated with lung cancer by leveraging gene expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) data from the eQTLGen consortium, and validated these findings orthogonally using protein expression trait loci (pQTL) data. In addition, we performed survival analysis, genetic diagnostic analysis, and differential expression analysis to further test their correlation with lung cancer. Summary-level data from ILCCO and FinnGen R9 were used as discovery datasets, and the TRICL consortium was used as an independent replication cohort. Together, we applied these methods to assess the causal relationship between these putative gene targets and lung cancer risk, and to determine whether they are associated with patient morbidity and prognosis. FINDING: Among 2,645 candidate genes with robust cis-eQTL instruments, we prioritized four genes (SERPING1, THBS3, FLT4 and CHEK1) that showed strong causal associations with lung cancer risk and high posterior probabilities of co-localization (PP.H4 > 0.80) between eQTL and lung cancer GWAS signals. Genetically higher expression of SERPING1, THBS3 and FLT4 was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, whereas higher CHEK1 expression was associated with a reduced risk. All four putative gene targets were consistently validated across independent cohorts.
interpretationThis multi-omics MR framework identifies genes whose genetically predicted expression is associated with increased or decreased lung cancer risk and may help prioritize candidate targets for future lung cancer drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.