ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ensemble processing, which allows the visual system to form summary statistical representations (e.g., the average size of a bowl of apples), can be influenced by attention. However, can such internally, statistically generated representations influence the deployment of attention? To answer this question, we conducted two experiments using a modified version of an attentional cueing paradigm with an ensemble task. Each trial began by displaying an array of eight ovals of varying sizes. Next, two ovals to the left and right of fixation were presented, where one oval was the average size of the previous set (the ensemble object), and the other oval was a distractor (the foil object). On different trials, participants reported either which oval corresponded to the average size of the previous set (ensemble task) or the location of a probe dot on one of the objects (probe task). Experiment 1 used 80% ensemble task trials and further examined effects of attentional deployment when the foil object was outside the range of ensemble size values compared to inside the ensemble range. The results revealed attentional guidance when the foil was outside the ensemble range. Experiment 2 used 20% ensemble task trials with foils outside the ensemble range and found no attentional guidance, revealing that the strength of the internal ensemble representation affects whether or not attentional guidance effects will be observed. Overall, the results provide evidence that ensemble representations can influence the deployment of spatial attention, thereby demonstrating that these two cognitive mechanisms reciprocally interact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42265471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.