ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Zenflow spring system for benign prostatic hyperplasia - 24 month outcomes of the ZEST pilot studies.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Zenflow Spring System EU Safety and Performance Study
The Zenflow Spring System Safety, Performance and Effectiveness Study (ZEST2)
The Zenflow Spring System Safety and Performance Study (ZEST CAN)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of the Zenflow spring system: insights from a multidisciplinary perspective.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) affects more than half of men over age 50, yet current treatment options are limited to medications that cause bothersome side effects or surgical procedures, including minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) that involve piercing, cutting, or burning tissue, often leading to discomfort and recovery concerns. The Zenflow Spring System® provides a tissue-preserving alternative that offers symptom relief with quicker recovery and less procedural discomfort.
methodsThree single-arm, multicenter, prospective pilot studies with similar trial designs were conducted from 2018-2021 across four countries and data were combined to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the Spring System in relieving symptoms of obstructive BPH. Men ≥ 45 years with moderate-to-severe symptoms (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS ) >13), peak urinary flow rate (QMax) between 5 and 15 mL/s, prostate volume between 25 and 80 cc, prostatic urethral length between 25 and 45 mm, and voided volume of at least ≥ 125 mL were enrolled. The primary endpoint was symptom improvement 3 months post-procedure, measured by change in IPSS. Secondary endpoints included IPSS-QoL, and functional improvement measured by Qmax. Follow-up visits occurred through 24 months.
resultsSuccessful implantation of the Spring Implant was achieved in all 72 study participants, with no perioperative serious adverse events. At 3 months, mean change from baseline was -10.71 (95% CI: -12.90, -8.51, p < 0.001) for IPSS, -2.1 (95% CI: -2.61, -1.58, p < 0.001) for IPSS-QoL, and 2.86 (95% CI: 1.68, 4.04, p < 0.001) for Qmax, corresponding to 49%, 47%, and 27% improvements, respectively. These improvements were sustained through 24 months, with 48%, 55%, and 32% improvement relative to baseline in IPSS, IPSS-QoL, and Qmax, respectively.
conclusionsAt 24-months, treatment with the Spring System resulted in immediate, significant, and durable improvements compared with baseline, supporting its role as a minimally invasive, tissue-preserving treatment option for men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH.
trial registrationNCT03595735, NCT03577236, NCT04309695.
Identifiers
42265447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.