ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
FOLFOX plus nivolumab combination therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients with untreated advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FOLFOX in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Role as a Cisplatin-Sparing Chemoimmunotherapy Backbone.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombination chemotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is a standard first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, cisplatin is unsuitable for patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction and older patients because of nephrotoxicity and the need for hydration. Oxaliplatin-based regimens (e.g., FOLFOX) have demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and are well tolerated in cisplatin-unfit patients with untreated advanced ESCC. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of FOLFOX combined with an ICI in these patients.
methodsCisplatin-unfit patients with untreated advanced ESCC who received FOLFOX plus nivolumab at our institution between January 2024 and July 2025 were retrospectively identified. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and the response rate were evaluated as efficacy endpoints and adverse events as safety endpoints.
resultsSeventeen patients with a median age of 75 years (range, 62-82) were included. ECOG performance status was 0 in 3 cases (17.6%), 1 in 11 (64.7%), and 2 in 3 (17.6%). The main reasons for cisplatin ineligibility were older age (88.2%) and poor condition (58.8%). The response rate was 57.1% in patients with measurable lesions during a median follow-up of 9.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval 3.6-not reached [NR]) and median overall survival was 15.6 months (4.5-NR). Common adverse events were neutropenia (41.2%) and leukopenia (35.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.
conclusionsFOLFOX plus nivolumab might have effectiveness and safety comparable with that of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus nivolumab in cisplatin-unfit patients with untreated advanced ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42265434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.