ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Spatial structure triggers systematic foraging: Segmenting search displays leads to searching by segments.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial structure often provides information about the likely location of targets in visual search tasks and in real life. However, the extent to which spatial structure affects attention when it provides no information about target locations is less well understood. This is investigated here using a visual foraging task, whereby individuals search for many targets amongst many distractors. In six online experiments, participants foraged for multiple instances of two target types amongst two distractor types, defined by either features or conjunctions. Experiments comprised a series of manipulations of the presence, quantity, visibility, and availability of spatial structure. This was achieved via visibly segmenting displays into areas containing equal numbers of objects. These experiments assessed the effects of spatial structure on foraging using a broad range of measures and across variations including the presence of time limits and visual feedback within the display. Task-irrelevant spatial structure consistently encouraged systematic foraging, whereby participants were more likely to continue foraging within one display segment rather than to move to another. Foraging in this manner was associated with costs to foraging efficiency, and benefits to spatial memory. The general strength of the visual information about spatial structure modified the extent to which this information affected systematic foraging and foraging efficiency. Overall, spatial structure can affect individuals' foraging patterns and strategies even when it provides no information about the potential locations of targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.