Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265430›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Spatial structure triggers systematic foraging: Segmenting search displays leads to searching by segments.

Peter J Goodwin, Filipe Cristino, Duncan Guest, Christina J Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter J GoodwinDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-2626
Filipe CristinoDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, UK.
Duncan GuestDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, UK.
Christina J HowardDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, UK. Christina.Howard@ntu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial structure often provides information about the likely location of targets in visual search tasks and in real life. However, the extent to which spatial structure affects attention when it provides no information about target locations is less well understood. This is investigated here using a visual foraging task, whereby individuals search for many targets amongst many distractors. In six online experiments, participants foraged for multiple instances of two target types amongst two distractor types, defined by either features or conjunctions. Experiments comprised a series of manipulations of the presence, quantity, visibility, and availability of spatial structure. This was achieved via visibly segmenting displays into areas containing equal numbers of objects. These experiments assessed the effects of spatial structure on foraging using a broad range of measures and across variations including the presence of time limits and visual feedback within the display. Task-irrelevant spatial structure consistently encouraged systematic foraging, whereby participants were more likely to continue foraging within one display segment rather than to move to another. Foraging in this manner was associated with costs to foraging efficiency, and benefits to spatial memory. The general strength of the visual information about spatial structure modified the extent to which this information affected systematic foraging and foraging efficiency. Overall, spatial structure can affect individuals' foraging patterns and strategies even when it provides no information about the potential locations of targets.

Indexed as

AttentionPattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionSpatial MemoryAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultSpatial cognitionVisual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID42265430
PMCPMC13249926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.