Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265359›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Shape-similarity gain: A selection profile for simple objects.

Brendan Valentine, Xiaoli Zhang, Taosheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan ValentineDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. valen207@msu.edu.
Xiaoli ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Taosheng LiuDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has examined the selection profile-the pattern of enhancement and suppression of stimuli when allocating attention to a specific feature value. Support for several different selection profiles for simple feature dimensions (e.g., color, orientation) have been identified such as the feature-similarity gain and surround suppression effects. However, it is unclear whether the selection profile for more complex stimuli follows a similar pattern. Using a recently developed circular shape space, the current study assessed the selection profile for these simple shapes as an initial step toward the study of object-based attention. Participants attended to two target shapes while ignoring two distractors, each overlapping with one target. They performed a change identification task, reporting luminance changes of only the target shapes. We systematically varied the difference between the two targets in the shape space. In two experiments covering different ranges in the shape space, performance accuracy peaked when the two target shapes matched and then decreased in a monotonic manner as the two shapes became more different. These results align with a feature-similarity gain model and suggest that an analogous shape-similarity gain effect operates for more complex stimuli. This gain effect suggests that shape-based selection occurs in an intrinsic similarity space which can be realized by top-down attention operating on neural substrates that encode object similarity.

Indexed as

AttentionDiscrimination, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualColor PerceptionHumansOrientationPsychophysicsReaction TimeAttention: object-basedAttention: SelectiveSimilarity

Identifiers

PMID42265359
PMCPMC13249725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.