ArticleScientific reports2026
Central auditory processing and interhemispheric integration: the relationship between speech sound coding disorder and articulation disorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NSX-Net: A Neurolinguistic and Acoustic Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Speech Disorder Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to demonstrate that speech sound disorders associated with central auditory processing disorder stem from a processing disorder in the central auditory pathways during listening, rather than from an articulation-based disorder. Included 25 children with articulation problems (WAP; 7 females, 18 males) and 25 typically developing children without articulation problems (WoAP; 10 females, 15 males), aged 5-8 years. Assessments comprised the Hacettepe Articulation Test, Scan-C subtests (Filtered Words, Auditory Figure-Ground, Competing Words, Competing Sentences), and the Denver II Developmental Screening Test. The Children in the WAP group scored low on the left ear only in the dichotic words and dichotic sentences tests. Left ear performance was significantly lower in the dichotic words test (p = 0.026, Cohen's d = 0.609) and the dichotic sentences (p = 0.001, r = 0.427). These results suggest that articulation disorders may indicate a central auditory processing deficit, particularly a delay in right-hemisphere auditory maturation. It has been observed that in children with central auditory processing disorder, whatever speech sounds they process defectively during listening, they also produce those same sounds defectively. In this context, this study offers a new perspective on the relationship between articulation disorders and central auditory processing. Therefore, it is recommended that central auditory processing screening be conducted in children with articulation disorders to distinguish the underlying disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.