ArticleScientific reports2026
A data-light composite climate resilience index reveals superior drought resilience of millets in rainfed agroecosystems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rainfed agriculture is highly vulnerable to increasing rainfall variability and drought under climate change, necessitating robust and transferable approaches for assessing crop resilience. The IPCC climate risk and resilience framework conceptualizes resilience as the integrated interaction of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Accordingly, the Composite Crop Resilience Index (CCRI) was developed by integrating exposure resilience under the exposure component, rainfall-yield elasticity-based sensitivity resilience under the sensitivity component, and detrended Yield Stability Index (YSI) under the adaptive capacity component using long-term district-level rainfall and crop yield datasets (1998-2023). Rice exhibited the highest climatic sensitivity, with drought-year yield reductions frequently exceeding 40-60% and high rainfall-yield elasticity across districts, followed by maize. In contrast, millet crops consistently recorded lower drought-induced yield losses, lower rainfall sensitivity, higher yield stability, and consequently higher CCRI values across districts. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated stable resilience rankings under alternative weighting scenarios, confirming the robustness of the CCRI framework. Overall, millet-based systems exhibited substantially greater climatic resilience than rice-based systems under drought-prone rainfed conditions, highlighting their potential for climate adaptation and resilient crop diversification in vulnerable agroecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.