Trial reportSpinal cord2026
A study on the application effectiveness of discharge preparation strategies from a dual perspective among spinal cord injury rehabilitation patients and their spouses.
Trial report in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRandomized controlled trial (RCT).
objectiveTo explore the application effectiveness of discharge preparation strategies from a dual perspective among spinal cord injury rehabilitation patients and their spouses, providing scientific evidence for optimizing the discharge rehabilitation management model for spinal cord injury patients.
settingHangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
methodsFrom July 2023 to March 2024, SCI patients were randomly allocated to a control group (routine discharge preparation) or an intervention group (routine preparation plus a multidisciplinary dual-perspective intervention). Outcomes were assessed using the Discharge Readiness Scale (RHDS), Discharge Guidance Quality Scale (QDTS), Dual Coping Inventory (DCI), SF-36 health survey, and Caregiver Preparation Scale (CPS) at admission and 48-72 hours before discharge.
resultsBefore discharge, both groups showed improved RHDS and QDTS scores, but the intervention group had significantly higher scores. Patients and spouses in the intervention group also demonstrated greater improvements in DCI scores, indicating better collaborative coping. Spouses in this group scored higher on the CPS, reflecting better preparedness. At 3-month follow-up, the intervention group had superior SF-36 scores and lower complication rates.
conclusionA discharge preparation strategy based on a dual patient-spouse perspective can significantly improve the discharge readiness, couple's collaborative coping ability, and spouse's caregiving ability of patients with spinal cord injury, thereby enhancing their long-term quality of life and providing a new direction for establishing a family-collaborative rehabilitation management model. Visual Abstract: Dual-Perspective Discharge Preparation in SCI Rehabilitation. A randomized trial of 78 spinal cord injury patient-spouse dyads found that a dual-perspective discharge preparation strategy significantly improved readiness for discharge, dyadic coping, and spousal preparedness, and reduced complications at 3 months, supporting a family-collaborative rehabilitation model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42265250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.