Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265243›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

A novel technique for safe intraoperative perilymph sampling in humans.

William Shute, Dongcheng Zhang, Amy Hampson, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen J O'Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William ShuteDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia. wshute@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-8546
Dongcheng ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia.
Amy HampsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia.
Jean-Marc GerardDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia.
Stephen J O'LearyDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo calibrate nylon epidural catheters against glass capillaries for obtaining reliable volume yields and present the development and implementation of a translatable human perilymph sampling methodology which minimally impacts cochlear function.

methodsTwo gauges of nylon epidural catheters were calibrated against glass capillary tubes to establish the minimum fluid column height to yield a desired sample volume. We also report development of a proposed surgical methodology for in vivo sampling, and implementation in a clinical cohort study of cochlear implant recipients. We assessed the impact of sampling on hearing in a subset of hearing preservation candidates.

resultsCorrelation equations for both 18G and 16G catheters yielding a desired sample volume 'x' with a fluid column height 'y'. The equations for 18G and 16G catheters respectively are y = 6.538x + 1.0894 and 3.8008x + 0.6754. A sampling apparatus consisting of an epidural catheter passed through a house suction tip attached to a 1 mL syringe provides optimal ergonomics and manoeuvrability. Extracochlear ECochG amplitudes and thresholds are unaffected by collection of perilymph using this technique, as were 3-month hearing preservation outcomes.

conclusionThese results describe a safe, accurate and transferrable alternative to using glass capillaries to sample directly from the human inner ear during surgery.

Indexed as

CathetersCochlear ImplantationPerilymphAdultCalibrationChildCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCochlear implantationElectrocochleographyHearing lossHuman researchPerilymph sampling

Identifiers

PMID42265243
PMCPMC13407573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.