ArticleScientific reports2026
A biophysical model linking cortical scalar potentials and polarization waves to slow traveling activity in vision.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent experimental studies indicate that visual cognition is accompanied by slowly propagating biophysical traveling waves in cortical tissue. Here, we propose that polarization waves within the visual cortex provide the biophysical basis for the observed slowly propagating traveling waves. For this, we first compute the propagation speed of scalar potential fields generated by impressed ionic currents in primary visual cortex using a theoretically derived telegraph-type model equation. On the basis of the linear convolution framework, we then show that the scalar potential field [Formula: see text] and the polarization wave [Formula: see text], arising from slowly oscillating neuronal dipoles, propagate with the same velocity. Remarkably, the predicted speed is consistent with the independently estimated propagation speed of an effective cortical modulation wave (~ 1.5 cm/s). Since each parallel retinal/LGN/geniculocortical pathway gathers signals from more than a hundred photoreceptors, the resulting response is likely to cover a range of effective cortical wave numbers. In this multi-[Formula: see text] regime, we show that dispersive spreading naturally emerges over time, which may reduce cross-channel interference and help stabilize perceptual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.