Observational studyScientific reports2026
The eGFR difference between creatinine-based and cystatin-C-based equations is also important in an Asian population within the J-CKD-DB-Ex.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that a large negative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) difference (eGFRdiff), defined as the cystatin C-based eGFR minus the creatinine-based eGFR, is related with kidney events. However, whether this association applies to the Japanese population remains unclear. This study assessed the importance of a negative eGFRdiff in the Japanese population. This was a retrospective cohort study using the J-CKD-DB-Ex. The association between baseline eGFRdiff and kidney composite outcome defined as progression to CKD stage G5 (eGFRcr < 15 mL/min/1.73 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.