Trial reportScientific reports2026
Ischemic preconditioning modulates the acute post-exercise inflammatory, angiogenic, and neurotrophic response in endurance runners.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05412888 (The Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning and Physical Exercise on the Endocrine Function of Skeletal Muscle - the Effect of CoQ10 Supplementation. In Vivo and in Vitro Studies.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning and Physical Exercise on the Endocrine Function of Skeletal Muscle - the Effect of CoQ10 Supplementation. In Vivo and in Vitro Studies.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial examined whether a 21-day ischemic preconditioning (IPC) intervention modifies acute inflammatory, angiogenic, and neurotrophic responses to intense endurance exercise in competitive male long-distance runners. Forty runners were allocated to IPC (n = 20) or SHAM (n = 20), and 35 completed the study. Each participant performed a 20 × 400 m interval running test before and after the intervention, with blood collected before exercise, immediately after exercise, and 24 h post-exercise. Before the intervention, the running trial induced significant time-dependent increases in all inflammatory biomarkers and in all angiogenic and neurotrophic markers. After the intervention, IPC was associated with higher post-exercise IL-10 and IL-15 responses than SHAM, with peak between-group differences of 27% and 35%, respectively. Significant group × time interactions were also observed for BDNF and sAPPα; only SHAM showed a significant post-exercise BDNF increase, whereas sAPPα increased more strongly in IPC. In addition, ANG and NGF concentrations were overall 17% and 16% higher, respectively, in IPC than in SHAM. These findings indicate that repeated IPC modulates selected acute molecular responses to intense endurance exercise in a marker-specific manner, although the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT05412888, Registration date: 09/06/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.