Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

HOG-supervised compact CNNs for real-time visual place recognition.

A H Abdul Hafez, Imad Odeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A H Abdul HafezDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia. aabdulhafiz@kfu.edu.sa.
Imad OdehHigher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Damascus - Barza, Syria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents HOGNet, an efficient deep learning framework aimed at replicating and improving histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) features for visual place recognition (VPR). HOGNet distinguishes itself from traditional deep models by utilizing handcrafted descriptors for efficiency and interpretability, while simultaneously harnessing the representational capabilities of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), thus reducing the need for extensive labeled datasets and significant computational resources. Two variants of the model, HOGNet_441 and HOGNet_1764, are developed to predict HOG descriptors of varying lengths, facilitating adaptable implementation in diverse computational environments. We assess HOGNet using two challenging datasets, the Nordland dataset and the India driving dataset (IDD-VPR), and perform thorough comparisons with established architectures such as VGG16, ResNet101, and MobileNet. HOGNet_441 achieves 67.7% validation accuracy and 90.76% Recall@20, outperforming VGG16 (88.00% at Recall@20) while being 36x faster (3.44 ms vs. 124.17 ms). An ablation study confirms that HOG supervision provides a +5.55% accuracy improvement over a baseline CNN without HOG targets. Intermediate convolutional layers (Pool2, Pool3) are shown to be more effective for VPR than output layers. HOGNet achieves approximately 290 FPS, making it suitable for real-time and resource-constrained applications. The findings underscore the potential of incorporating handcrafted feature descriptors into deep learning models to attain an optimal balance among accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHandcrafted FeaturesHistogram of Oriented GradientsHOGNetLightweight ModelsVisual Place Recognition

Identifiers

PMID42265161
PMCPMC13493866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.