ArticleScientific reports2026
HOG-supervised compact CNNs for real-time visual place recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents HOGNet, an efficient deep learning framework aimed at replicating and improving histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) features for visual place recognition (VPR). HOGNet distinguishes itself from traditional deep models by utilizing handcrafted descriptors for efficiency and interpretability, while simultaneously harnessing the representational capabilities of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), thus reducing the need for extensive labeled datasets and significant computational resources. Two variants of the model, HOGNet_441 and HOGNet_1764, are developed to predict HOG descriptors of varying lengths, facilitating adaptable implementation in diverse computational environments. We assess HOGNet using two challenging datasets, the Nordland dataset and the India driving dataset (IDD-VPR), and perform thorough comparisons with established architectures such as VGG16, ResNet101, and MobileNet. HOGNet_441 achieves 67.7% validation accuracy and 90.76% Recall@20, outperforming VGG16 (88.00% at Recall@20) while being 36x faster (3.44 ms vs. 124.17 ms). An ablation study confirms that HOG supervision provides a +5.55% accuracy improvement over a baseline CNN without HOG targets. Intermediate convolutional layers (Pool2, Pool3) are shown to be more effective for VPR than output layers. HOGNet achieves approximately 290 FPS, making it suitable for real-time and resource-constrained applications. The findings underscore the potential of incorporating handcrafted feature descriptors into deep learning models to attain an optimal balance among accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.