Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265158›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Adaptive graph-evolutionary framework for dynamic feature refinement in multi-label learning.

Hossein Movahed, Tina Toosi, Shamim Nael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hossein MovahedDepartment of Management, Payame Noor University, Babol, 1334838499, Iran. lisrel167@gmail.com.
Tina ToosiTelecommunications Technology Engineering, Khayyam Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.
Shamim NaelSchool of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-label learning in high-dimensional environments is fundamentally challenged by complex interdependencies among features and labels, as well as redundancy and noise that degrade predictive performance and scalability. Conventional feature selection techniques typically rely on static optimization or one-shot subset identification, limiting their ability to adapt to evolving feature relevance during learning. To address these limitations, this study introduces an adaptive graph-evolutionary framework for dynamic feature refinement in multi-label learning. Instead of treating feature selection as a fixed optimization problem, the proposed approach models feature reduction as a sequential decision process guided by structural relationships and uncertainty estimation. A heterogeneous graph is constructed to capture feature-label-instance interactions, while a graph neural network dynamically evaluates feature reliability through confidence and uncertainty modeling. These signals are integrated into an evolutionary optimization mechanism that adaptively refines the feature space through staged elimination, enabling continuous adjustment to changing label dependencies. The proposed framework is evaluated on multiple benchmark datasets using standard multi-label classifiers. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving significant reductions in Hamming Loss and Ranking Loss, alongside notable gains in Average Precision and F1-score. Statistical analysis confirms the robustness and significance of the improvements across varying data distributions.

Indexed as

Evolutionary optimizationFeature eliminationGraph neural networksHigh-dimensional dataMulti-label learning

Identifiers

PMID42265158
PMCPMC13547210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.