ArticleScientific data2026
A machine-learning-based reconstruction of surface mass balance over the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1950 to 2020.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate estimation of surface mass balance (SMB) is imperative for reliable quantification of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) mass changes and associated global sea level rise. Here, we present two new reconstructions of gridded annual SMB at the resolution of 0.1° × 0.1° across the GrIS from 1950 to 2020 by means of a CNN-Transformer model. This machine learning model is trained on the mostly recent compiled in-situ SMB observations, integrating with ERA5 Land reanalysis product, and outputs of the polar regional climate model MAR, respectively. When trained on the full dataset, the best-performing model predictions highly and significantly correlate with observations, with correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.93 for ERA5-Land-based and MAR-based reconstructions, respectively. Spatial cross-validation over unseen regions shows that reconstruction errors reduce by approximately 50% relative to the original datasets (ERA5-Land and MAR), with both reconstructions yielding statistically comparable RMSE (~53 mm w.e. yr
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.