Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265083›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Model predictive task sampling for efficient and robust adaptation.

Qi Cheems Wang, Zehao Xiao, Yixiu Mao, Yun Qu, Jiayi Shen, Yiqin Lv, Xiangyang Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi Cheems Wang *Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7758-725X
Zehao Xiao *Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-9211
Yixiu Mao *Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7302-5039
Yun Qu *Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1803-8435
Jiayi ShenInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-1457
Yiqin LvDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-0212
Xiangyang JiDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. xyji@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7333-9975

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (Ministry of Education of China) JYB2025XDXM503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation models and generalist policies rely on adaptation learning, including meta-training, domain randomization, and supervised finetuning. Challenging task prioritized sampling is essential for adaptation robustness under distribution shifts. However, ranking task difficulty requires exhaustive evaluation, which is prohibitively expensive whether through agent-environment interactions in meta reinforcement learning and domain randomization, or repeated forward passes in large model finetuning. We present Model Predictive Task Sampling (MPTS), a framework that bridges task space and adaptation risk distributions for active task selection. MPTS employs a lightweight generative model to predict task-specific adaptation risk, amortizing costly evaluation while provably ranking task difficulties. It can seamlessly integrate into zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised finetuning settings. We conduct extensive experiments in pattern recognition using foundation models and sequential decision-making. Empirically, MPTS significantly enhances adaptation robustness for tail risk or out-of-distribution tasks compared to superior methods, and improves learning efficiency over subset selection methods such as CVaR

Identifiers

PMID42265083
PMCPMC13402703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.