Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265070›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2026

Snapshot 3D image projection using a diffractive decoder.

Çağatay Işıl, Alexander Chen, Yuhang Li, F Onuralp Ardic, Shiqi Chen, Che-Yung Shen, Aydogan Ozcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Çağatay Işıl *Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander Chen *Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yuhang Li *Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-4125
F Onuralp ArdicElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3968-3875
Shiqi ChenElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6396-1595
Che-Yung ShenElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0546-6344
Aydogan OzcanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ozcan@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-683X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D image display is essential for next-generation volumetric imaging; however, dense depth multiplexing for 3D image projection remains challenging because diffraction-induced cross-talk rapidly increases as the axial image planes get closer. Here, we introduce a 3D display system comprising a digital encoder and a diffractive decoder, which simultaneously projects different images onto multiple target axial planes with high axial resolution. By leveraging multi-layer diffractive wavefront decoding and deep learning-based end-to-end optimization, the system achieves high-fidelity depth-resolved 3D image projection in a snapshot, enabling axial plane separations on the order of a wavelength. The digital encoder leverages a Fourier encoder network to capture multi-scale spatial and frequency-domain features from input images, integrates axial position encoding, and generates a unified phase representation that simultaneously encodes all images to be axially projected in a single snapshot through a jointly-optimized diffractive decoder. We characterized the impact of diffractive decoder depth, output diffraction efficiency, spatial light modulator resolution, and axial encoding density, revealing trade-offs that govern axial separation and 3D image projection quality. We further demonstrated the capability to display volumetric images containing 28 axial slices, as well as the ability to dynamically reconfigure the axial locations of the image planes, performed on demand. Finally, we experimentally validated a two-plane optical prototype using a single-layer physical decoder, demonstrating close agreement between the measured results and the target images. These results establish the diffractive 3D display system as a compact and scalable framework for depth-resolved snapshot 3D image projection, with potential applications in holographic displays, AR/VR interfaces, and volumetric optical computing.

Identifiers

PMID42265070
PMCPMC13250003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.