ArticlePharmacogenomics
Practical guide to implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenetic screening in routine pediatric oncology care.
Article in Pharmacogenomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interindividual variability in drug response is a challenge in pediatric oncology, where the risk of treatment-related toxicity is exacerbated by narrow therapeutic windows and combination therapies. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) aims to reduce this variability by linking genetic variants to differences in drug pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity. Although evidence-based pharmacogenetic guidelines are available covering over 100 gene-drug pairs, systematic use of pre-emptive PGx screening is not yet embedded in routine pediatric oncology care. In a recent study, we demonstrated the relevance of pre-emptive PGx screening in pediatric oncology by showing that 16% of 1,151 patients were eligible for genotype-based drug dose or treatment modifications. Building on these findings, we implemented pre-emptive PGx screening into clinical practice of pediatric oncology in the Netherlands. Successful implementation required addressing challenges, including adaptation of existing infrastructure, interpretation of pharmacogenetic results for a pediatric population, integration into electronic health records, and education of clinical staff. We repurposed diagnostic germline whole genome sequencing (WGS) for individual genetic profiling and applied existing pharmacogenetic guidelines to guide drug dosing and treatment decisions. Here, we describe our implementation strategy for pre-emptive PGx screening in pediatric oncology and share insights to support other centers aiming to integrate PGx screening into routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.