Observational studyOpen heart2026
Racial trends in outcomes and access to treatment for mitral regurgitation: a South London population cohort study.
Observational study in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacial disparities in valvular heart disease are well-documented, yet evidence specific to mitral regurgitation (MR) remains fragmented. This study examined racial differences in mortality and treatment access among patients with moderate-severe MR within a universal healthcare system.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilised digital health records from a South London tertiary centre using natural language processing (NLP), including demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and socioeconomic data. Adult patients with moderate or greater MR diagnosed between 2010 and 2023 were stratified by ethnicity (White, Black, Asian). Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and surgical/transcatheter intervention rates. Multivariable Cox regression and competing risk analyses adjusted for demographics, MR characteristics, comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation.
resultsThe cohort (n=6665) comprised 5331 (80.0%) White, 958 (14.4%) Black and 376 (5.6%) Asian patients with under-represented minority proportions relative to local demographics. Black patients presented younger (65.4 vs 72.2 years; p <0.001) with greater socio-economic deprivation (median IMD decile 3 vs 5), higher comorbidity burden and predominantly secondary MR (91% vs 85%; p <0.001). Crude mortality rates were 103.8, 88.1 and 80.4 per 1000 person-years for White, Black and Asian patients respectively. After adjustment, ethnicity was not independently associated with mortality (Black vs White: HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; p=0.06) or intervention (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11; p=0.18). Socioeconomic deprivation was independently associated with mortality (HR 0.97/IMD decile increase; p <0.001) and intervention rates. Crude intervention rates were lower in Black than in White patients (6.9% vs 12.7%), this difference attenuated after adjustment for MR aetiology, comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation and did not persist as an independent association (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11; p=0.18).
conclusionMR appears under-detected among minority patients relative to local demographics and occurs at a younger age and with a greater prevalence of secondary MR and comorbidity. Once identified, clinical factors and socioeconomic deprivation rather than ethnicity itself drive outcomes and treatment access, with no statistically independent association between ethnicity and either mortality or intervention, although modest but clinically relevant differences cannot be excluded given the cohort sizes. These findings highlight the need for enhanced valve disease detection in diverse communities alongside strategies addressing socioeconomic determinants of cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.