Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42264551›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

The Effects of Different Attentional Focus During Walking on Prefrontal Cortical Activation in Young Healthy Adults.

Tiphaine Grain, Canan Ozsancak, Julien Bonnal, Pascal Auzou, Fabrice Prieur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiphaine GrainSAPRéM, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.ORCID 0009-0002-8947-6939
Canan OzsancakService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Julien BonnalService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Pascal AuzouService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Fabrice PrieurSAPRéM, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of four attentional walking conditions on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation, an approach that has not previously been investigated. We hypothesized that DLPFC activation and perceived workload would be higher, and gait performance more disrupted, during walking with internal focus or divided attention compared to walking with external focus or without focus instructions. Participants performed four walking conditions with different attentional orientations. The conditions were presented in a randomized order and were conducted with block design. A deleterious effect of internal focus and divided attention was observed on gait performance, indicating that internal focus induced more conscious control interfering with automatic control processes of gait and that, for divided attention, participants were inclined to focus on the cognitive task to the detriment of gait. We observed significant DLPFC activation for each of the tasks but no significant difference when we compared them with each other. Internal focus and divided attention led to significantly higher mental demand, suggesting that they required greater involvement of cognitive resources, but no significantly higher DLPFC activation was observed, suggesting that young adults sacrificed enough gait performance to avoid excessive resource demands. For each of the four tasks, a significantly higher level of activity was detected in the left DLPFC which is one of the regions involved in attentional refreshment.

Indexed as

AttentionDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexPrefrontal CortexWalkingAdultDual-Task TestsFemaleGaitHumansMaleYoung Adultexternal focusfNIRSinternal focusyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42264551
PMCPMC13249535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.