ArticleBMJ open2026
Ontologies and zoonotic risk-related knowledge, attitudes and practices: a cross-sectional survey in Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Guatemala.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine whether Indigenous Peoples' and Local Communities' (IPLC) ontologies are associated with knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to wildlife cohabitation and zoonotic disease transmission in biodiversity-rich areas of Latin America.
designCross-sectional household survey using a standardised KAP questionnaire. Ontologies were classified using latent class analysis. Associations between ontology classes and outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.
settingUrban, rural and protected areas in biodiversity-rich regions of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Guatemala.
participantsA total of 2903 individuals aged ≥10 years were recruited through random household sampling (response rate 85%). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were defined according to the KAP framework. Knowledge outcomes comprised combined knowledge of zoonotic disease transmission from wildlife to humans and knowledge of zoonotic risks associated with wildlife trade. Perceived training needs related to zoonotic disease prevention were analysed as a secondary knowledge outcome measure. Attitudes were measured through risk perception, operationalised as concern about zoonotic disease transmission. Practices included self-reported hunting and slaughtering of wildlife.
resultsThe analysis identified three distinct ontology classes: Relational environmentalism (52% of the population), characterised by strong spiritual connections to animals and a tendency to protect wildlife; Dualistic environmentalism (28%), with a weaker spiritual connection to animals but a commitment to wildlife conservation; and Neutral (20%), demonstrating little spiritual connection to animals and a neutral attitude towards wildlife conservation. In the logistic regression analyses, both environmentalism groups exhibited greater knowledge of zoonotic transmission and concern about outbreaks, with members of the Relational class demonstrating higher levels of these attributes. Furthermore, members of the Dualistic environmentalism class were less likely to have close contact with animals.
conclusionsIn Latin America's biodiversity-rich regions, individuals whose ontology aligns with environmentalism appear to demonstrate a heightened awareness of zoonoses, particularly those who adhere to a Relational environmentalism perspective. Consequently, the integration of IPLC cultural knowledge holds potential to enhance wildlife conservation measures and contribute to the mitigation of disease transmission. Further research is needed to explore causal pathways and the integration of culturally grounded approaches into public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.