ArticleBMJ global health2026
Progress in family planning in Sierra Leone: a mixed-methods case study.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionExpanding access to voluntary family planning is a global health priority, yet progress has been uneven across low-income and middle-income countries. Despite being a fragile state with historically high fertility and limited health resources, Sierra Leone has achieved one of the fastest increases in modern contraceptive prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa. This study explores the drivers of this progress through a mixed-methods case study.
methodsWe analysed national-level data from urban and rural settings, and engaged diverse stakeholders including family planning professionals, healthcare providers, community leaders and service users. Quantitative data were drawn from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS 2008, 2013 and 2019), and United Nations (UN) Population Division estimates (1990-2022). Qualitative insights were obtained through 33 key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions. A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles, policies and programme documents was conducted to assess the broader implementation context.
resultsBetween 2008 and 2019, modern contraceptive prevalence among women aged 15-49 rose from 8.2% to 23.9% (+15.7 percentage points). Among married women, gains were larger in those aged 15-24 years (+12.6) than in women aged 25-49 years (+10.0). Unmarried women maintained substantially higher use, with gains of +19.5 and +16.9 points, respectively. Key drivers included expanded knowledge, higher education, delayed marriage and outreach by fieldworkers. Political commitment-particularly integration into the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI)-together with women's empowerment policies, donor and non-governmental organisation (NGO) support, media and community engagement improved access, awareness and autonomy.
conclusionsSierra Leone's progress demonstrates the importance of holistic approaches combining political commitment, external financing, cross-sector partnerships and community engagement. Government leadership was most evident in integrating family planning into the Free Health Care Initiative, while educational and gender-sensitive strategies proved particularly effective. These drivers consolidated gains and offer lessons for fragile, high-fertility settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.