Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42264477›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026

A quasi-stationary distribution bound for fault analysis in gene regulatory networks.

Fabricio Cravo, Matthias Függer, Thomas Nowak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabricio CravoNortheastern University - Boston Campus , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8351-7156
Matthias FüggerUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles , Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-0301
Thomas NowakUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles , Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-9342

Funding

Empirical Power Analysis Tool for fMRIR00MH130894 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, STEPHANIE MARIE · 2023 to 2025
$678k
Empirical Power Analysis Tool for fMRIK99MH130894 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, STEPHANIE MARIE · 2022 to 2022
$123k
COSTXPRESS ANR-23-CE45-0013France 2030 ANR-23-PEIA-0006French National Research Agency (ANR) projects DREAMY ANR-21-CE48-0003NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH130894NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH130894SAIF project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inherent stochastic fluctuations in signalling molecules of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) add unpredictability, complicating the design of robust synthetic GRNs that must function within precise ranges. Multi-stable GRNs, such as toggle switches, are central to systems like biosensors and logic gates, but can fail owing to unintended transitions between stable states caused by the fluctuations. Despite their importance, tools to characterize the probability distributions around stable states remain limited. We present a mathematical framework for analysing these multi-stable systems using continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) and quasi-stationary distributions (QSDs). This framework is broadly applicable, requiring only that the state space is connected, making it applicable to a variety of systems. We apply the framework to a toggle-switch design from the literature, identifying parameter thresholds at which systems transition from frequent stochastic switching (hours) to stable operation (years to decades), consistent with current experimental insights. We further present upper-bound calculations of false-positive/false-negative rates for population-level biosensor dynamics as supplementary results.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticMarkov ChainsStochastic Processesgene regulatory networksquasi-stationary distributionstochastic fault analysis

Identifiers

PMID42264477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.