ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2026
Transformer networks enable fast and robust dictionary generation for multiparametric cardiac mapping with variable timing.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac multiparametric mapping often relies on dictionary matching. When the acquisition timing varies due to electrocardiographic or navigator gating, dictionaries must be simulated for each acquisition, which is time-consuming and limits their in-line clinical utility. Deep learning can be used to accelerate this dictionary generation. In this work, we implement and evaluate a transformer network that leverages self-attention to capture long-range dependencies and compare its performance against a previously proposed fully connected multi-layer perceptron (FC-MLP).
methodsTransformer (6 layers, 700,674 trainable parameters) and FC-MLP (3 hidden layers, 300-300-75 units) networks were implemented, optimized, and trained on synthetic timing intervals generated through extended phase graph (EPG) simulation. Network performance was quantified as mean average percent error (MAPE) versus EPG simulations in silico, as a correlation in a mapping phantom and through Bland-Atman analysis in 138 patients (age 67±13 y, 50 F) at 3T. Inference time was recorded. Finally, the full mapping pipeline was integrated directly on the MR (magnetic resonance) scanner.
resultsEPG dictionary simulations required 30±2 minutes per subject, whereas the transformer completed inference in 13.2±0.4 s on CPU and 89.2±0.4 ms on GPU, representing a >100-fold acceleration. In the phantom experiments, the transformer achieved near-ideal correlation with the EPG dictionary (slope 1.00 vs 1.02 for FC-MLP) and demonstrated superior accuracy in Bland-Altman analysis, with smaller bias (1.8 ms vs 13.6 ms) and narrower limits of agreement. Across patient datasets, the transformer exhibited tighter error distributions for T
conclusionsThe transformer network significantly accelerates cardiac multiparametric map reconstruction while maintaining accuracy comparable to EPG simulations and superior to the FC‑MLP. Its robustness to variable acquisition timing and minimal bias support clinical feasibility, and successful on‑scanner integration demonstrates the potential for routine in‑line deployment of quantitative T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.