ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2026
Approach to prevention and management of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in North American lung transplant centers.
Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major barrier to long-term survival after lung transplantation, but literature documenting contemporary practice patterns and best practices for management are lacking. We sought to characterize monitoring and lung function-dependent management strategies across adult North American lung transplant centers. A RedCap survey was distributed to 21 centers accounting for nearly half of North American lung transplants. Routine immunosuppression and post-transplant graft monitoring protocols were similar among centers. Prophylactic azithromycin was routinely used by 7 (33.3%) centers, and respondents had substantial uncertainty regarding its effectiveness. A persistent ≥10% FEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.