Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026
Enteral iron dose effect on iron storage, intestinal barrier, and gut microbiome in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04497012 (Enteral Iron Supplementation and Intestinal Health in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enteral Iron Supplementation and Intestinal Health in Preterm Infants
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreterm infants routinely receive enteral iron supplementation to support growth, replace phlebotomy losses, and prevent iron deficiency. However, concerns regarding potential harms, including those on the gut microbiome, have contributed to recommendations for lower dosing.
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the effects of 2 enteral iron doses on gut health in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. We hypothesized that higher iron dose would increase abundances of pathogenic bacteria, intestinal inflammation, and barrier dysfunction.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial assigned preterm infants born <1500 g to receive either the recommended dose, 2 mg/kg/d, or a higher dose of 6 mg/kg/d of total enteral iron. The primary outcome was the fecal microbiome after 2 wk on iron, assessed by metagenomic sequencing. Secondary outcomes included biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and barrier function (fecal calprotectin, urinary claudin-3, and urinary intestinal fatty acid-binding protein). Iron status, adverse events, and auditory brainstem response latencies at 36 wk postmenstrual age were also evaluated.
resultsAmong 151 randomly assigned infants who received study iron (77 low dose; 74 high dose), bacterial diversity, individual taxa, virulence potential, bacterial overgrowth, and iron-related functional genes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. In the subgroup analysis of singletons, treatment groups demonstrated significant differences in temporal shifts in overall bacterial community structure. Infants receiving 2 mg/kg/d had higher posttreatment urinary claudin-3 concentrations, indicating possible differences in intestinal permeability, and a higher prevalence of iron deficiency than those receiving 6 mg/kg/d. Other biomarkers, clinical outcomes, adverse events, and auditory latencies did not differ between groups.
conclusionsEnteral iron supplementation at 6 mg/kg/d is associated with improved iron status and lower intestinal barrier dysfunction, without evidence of harms on gut microbiome compared with the recommended 2 mg/kg/d dose. These findings do not support concerns regarding gut microbiome disruption as a justification for lower iron dosing in preterm infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04497012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.