ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2026
Artifactual declines in durable LVAD utilization among heart transplant candidates: Selection bias in transplant registries.
Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Under-Capture of Candidates Supported by Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in the OPTN STAR Registry.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Reply: Under-Capture of Candidates Supported by Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in the OPTN STAR Registry.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) files are commonly used to study use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) among heart transplant candidates. However, the STAR MCS file reports devices only for candidates removed from the waitlist, whereas the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) MCS file includes devices for all candidates. We compared the STAR and SRTR MCS files in estimating trends in LVAD support and waitlist outcomes among heart transplant candidates with durable LVADs.
methodsWe identified adult heart transplant candidates who obtained durable LVADs between October 18, 2018 and December 31, 2024 using MCS files from STAR (N = 4182) and SRTR (N = 4919). We estimated the cumulative incidence of transplantation and death/deterioration in both cohorts and analyzed LVAD prevalence at bimonthly intervals from October 2018 to April 2025.
resultsThe SRTR cohort showed stable LVAD prevalence (30.7% to 37.4%). In contrast, the STAR cohort constructed from the MCS file showed a 92.5% decline in LVAD prevalence (1740 to 131 candidates), despite 971 candidates listed with status 4 for LVAD support on April 30, 2025. The STAR cohort demonstrated higher 3-year cumulative incidence of transplantation (66.7% vs 54.4%) and death/deterioration (10.1% vs 4.5%) after LVAD implantation. When we reran STAR-based analyses with both MCS and status justification files, prevalence and outcomes matched SRTR estimates.
conclusionsThe STAR MCS file excludes LVADs among currently listed candidates, producing artifactual declines in LVAD prevalence and incidence and inflated waitlist outcomes. Awareness of registry construction is essential for accurate interpretation of LVAD-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.