ArticleBlood advances2026
Peritransplant molecular MRD monitoring by targeted NGS in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FLT3-ITD MRD is here to stay.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractRelapse is the predominant cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in FLT3 gene internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although measurable residual disease (MRD) is increasingly used for risk stratification, optimal FLT3-ITD MRD assessment, the prognostic value of peritransplant MRD dynamics, and their implications in transplant-related decision-making remain unclear. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of 219 patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML in morphologic complete remission at transplantation, assessing peritransplant MRD by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-next-generation sequencing (NGS). Pretransplant MRD positivity (≥0.001% by PCR-NGS) was associated with inferior outcomes vs MRD negativity (2-year relapse-free survival [RFS], 56.8% vs 86.5%; cumulative incidence of relapse, 30.0% vs 6.9%; overall survival, 65.9% vs 88.4%; all P< .001). Peritransplant MRD dynamics outperformed single time point assessments, identifying patients at high risk such as those with post-HCT MRD conversion. Post-HCT FLT3 inhibitor maintenance independently improved RFS (P = .003), with greatest benefit observed in patients who were MRD-positive. These findings support PCR-NGS-based molecular MRD assessment to refine risk stratification and guide individualized transplant strategies in FLT3-ITD-mutated AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.