Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263670›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026

Comparing Adverse Health Outcomes in Infants Born to Women Monoinfected with Zika Virus or Infected with Both Zika and Chikungunya Viruses during Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Pernambuco, Brazil (2015-2017).

Gabriela Renata Neves Fulco, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Ulisses Ramos Montarroyos, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli, Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo, Elizabeth Brickley, Mariana de Carvalho Leal Gouveia, Liana Maria Viera de Oliveira Ventura, Maria Valquíria de Medeiros Silva, Juliana Menezes Soares de Souza Azevedo Fontes and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriela Renata Neves FulcoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Ricardo Arraes de Alencar XimenesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Ulisses Ramos MontarroyosInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Celina Maria Turchi MartelliDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Brazil.
Thalia Velho Barreto de AraújoDepartamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Elizabeth BrickleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Mariana de Carvalho Leal GouveiaDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Liana Maria Viera de Oliveira VenturaDepartamento de Oftalmologia, Fundação Altino Ventura, Recife, Brazil.
Maria Valquíria de Medeiros SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Juliana Menezes Soares de Souza Azevedo FontesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Demócrito de Barros Miranda-FilhoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in pregnant women and congenital defects is well-established. However, the consequences of infection with both ZIKV and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) during pregnancy remain poorly understood. The aim for the present study was to estimate and compare the risk of adverse outcomes in infants born to mothers infected with ZIKV alone and those born to mothers infected with both ZIKV and CHIKV during pregnancy. A cohort study was conducted, following pregnant women with rash who were reported to the Strategic Health Surveillance Information Center of the State of Pernambuco between 2015 and 2017 and underwent laboratory testing for ZIKV and CHIKV. All participants resided within a 120-kilometer radius of the city of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Newborns were monitored through standardized assessments conducted by specialists from the Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group. Adverse outcomes were compared between newborns prenatally exposed to ZIKV alone and those exposed to both ZIKV and CHIKV using descriptive statistics, as well as RRs. A total of 278 children (n = 198 exposed to ZIKV alone; n = 80 exposed to ZIKV and CHIKV) were included. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the offspring's risks of microcephaly, low birth weight, prematurity, small for gestational age, dysphagia, neurological, ophthalmological, audiological, or neuroimaging abnormalities. Although previous studies have revealed that each infection independently may be associated with adverse outcomes in newborns, the present study generally revealed no difference in the frequency or type of adverse effects in children born to mothers infected with both ZIKV and CHIKV compared with those exposed only to ZIKV during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverMicrocephalyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika Virus InfectionAdultBrazilChikungunya virusCoinfectionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42263670
PMCPMC13447755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.