Trial reportBlood advances2026
Sirolimus for refractory/relapsed warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia and Evans syndrome: a prospective study.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05925023 (Sirolimus in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sirolimus in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA): a Phase 2 Prospective Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEffective therapeutic options remain limited for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) and Evans syndrome (ES). We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus. Adult patients with R/R wAIHA or ES and hemoglobin levels <100 g/L received oral sirolimus (1-3 mg/day; target trough concentration, 4-15 ng/mL) for ≥6 months. The coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) at 6 months; secondary end points included 12-month efficacy, safety, and relapse rates. Seventy-eight consecutive patients were enrolled (median age, 52 years [interquartile range (IQR), 38-65]), including 63 (80.8%) with wAIHA and 15 (19.2%) with ES. With a median follow-up of 13.9 months (IQR, 12.7-17.0), sirolimus achieved a 6-month ORR of 80.7% (81.0% for wAIHA and 80.0% for ES) and CRR of 51.3% (52.4% for wAIHA and 46.7% for ES). Median times to overall and complete response were 2.4 months (IQR, 1.8-5.0) and 3.6 months (IQR, 2.3-7.0), respectively. Responses were sustained at 12 months (ORR, 78.2%; CRR, 50.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 28.2% of patients and were predominantly mild and reversible. Relapse and mortality rates were 12.7% and 2.8%, respectively. No baseline clinical characteristics were independently associated with response at 6 months. Sirolimus demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy, durable responses, and a favorable safety profile, supporting its role as a steroid-sparing option for steroid-dependent patients and a potential treatment alternative for steroid-refractory R/R wAIHA and ES. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05925023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.