Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263579›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2026

Frequency of lymph node involvement in clinically early-stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Viveros-Carreño, Nuria Agustí, Nathalia Mora-Soto, Isabel Beshar, Martina Aida Angeles, Juliana Rodríguez, Kate J Krause, Maria D Iniesta, Roni Nitecki Wilke, Alexander Melamed and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David Viveros-CarreñoClinica Universitaria Colombia, Clínica Colsanitas S.A., Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Grupo de Investigación Salud de la Mujer Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia; Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: dviverosc@gmail.com.
Nuria AgustíThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Nathalia Mora-SotoCentro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica del Country, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Bogotá, Colombia.
Isabel BesharThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Martina Aida AngelesVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Barcelona, Spain.
Juliana RodríguezUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bogotá, Colombia; Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Bogotá, Colombia; Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Research Support and Follow-up Group, Bogotá, Colombia.
Kate J KrauseThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Research Medical Library, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria D IniestaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Roni Nitecki WilkeThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexander MelamedMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
J Alejandro Rauh-HainThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
René ParejaInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica de Oncología Astorga, Medellín, Colombia.

Funding

Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of lymph node metastasis among patients with clinically early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage I-IIA) low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary surgical treatment.

methodsRegistered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD420251165472), this systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science from inception through September 2025. Eligible studies included patients with pathologically confirmed low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who were clinically presumed to have International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage I to IIA disease at surgery and underwent primary surgical management with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection. We conducted a meta-analysis of single proportions to estimate the pooled rate of lymph node metastasis. Study-specific proportions (events/total) were pooled using an inverse-variance random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation and back-transformed to proportions with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses excluded registry-based studies, studies at high risk of bias, and stage II disease.

resultsAmong 129 screened records, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review. Overall, 77 patients had lymph node metastasis, corresponding to a pooled incidence of lymph node metastasis of 9.6% (95% confidence interval 4.4% to 16.0%; I

conclusionsApproximately 1 in 10 patients with clinically early-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma harbors occult nodal metastasis. These findings support discussing lymph node assessment as a source of staging information during preoperative counseling and individualized surgical planning. The prognostic and therapeutic value of identifying isolated nodal disease and the morbidity trade-offs in this setting remain unclear.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousLymph NodesOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingLow-Grade Serous Ovarian CarcinomaLymph Node MetastasisOvarian NeoplasmsSurgical Staging

Identifiers

PMID42263579
PMCPMC13419658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.