ArticleJournal of food science2026
Predicting Microbial Growth Dynamics in Commercial Cocoa-Flavored Plant-Based Milk Alternatives.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the growth of Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Typhimurium in commercially available cocoa-flavored plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) under different temperatures and examined the influence of product composition on bacterial development. Bacterial populations were monitored over 12 h at 25°C for all strains and additionally at their optimal growth temperatures (30°C for B. cereus, 37°C for E. coli, and S. Typhimurium). The nutritional composition of the PBMAs was analyzed, and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify key compositional factors. Results showed that the increase in E. coli and Salmonella Typhimurium population was significantly higher at 37°C than at 25°C on all cocoa-flavored PBMAs (p < 0.05), whereas for B. cereus, the differences between 25°C and 30°C were relatively small, with statistical significance observed only for Substrate A (p < 0.05). Growth was significantly influenced by bacterial species (MS = 10.49, p < 0.001), substrate composition (MS = 0.48, p < 0.001), and interaction of both these factors (MS = 0.29, p = 0.001). The formulated regression models based on environmental factor (temperature), PCA scores (reflecting substrate composition, particularly protein, fiber, fat, sodium, and energy balance, and for B. cereus also sodium, fiber, and pH-related properties), and time, accurately reproduced bacterial growth (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.