Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263173›Full record

ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2026

Patients seeking occupational health advice before and after COVID-19.

Hadia Hazoor, Nick Pearson, Francis Creed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hadia HazoorSheffield Institute of Social Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Nick PearsonSheffield Occupational Health Advisory Service (SOHAS) 33, Rockingham Lane, Sheffield, S1 4FW, UK.
Francis CreedEmeritus Professor, University of Manchester and Trustee of Sheffield Occupational Health Advisory Service, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-4797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased prevalence of psychological disorder in population-based studies, but the effect on the ability to work has been less well studied, except in health workers.

aimsThis study aimed to assess whether there has been an increase in the number of people seeking assistance for psychological problems from the Sheffield Occupational Health Advisory service in the UK since the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe study used routinely collected data at Sheffield Occupational Health Advisory Service (SOHAS) to compare the proportion of all new referrals presenting with psychological problems for 3 years prior to (2017-2019) and following the pandemic (2022-2024). Statistical differences were assessed using the chi-square test.

resultsPsychological problems were the most common health problem presenting among those seeking advice at SOHAS both before (57.9%) and after the pandemic (61.5%); this was a small, but significant, difference (P < 0.01). In the post-COVID period, phone consultations largely replaced face-to-face appointments, and the patients were slightly younger, less likely to be referred by a GP and less likely to be off work through illness. The advice given post-COVID was more likely to include employment law and disability discrimination.

conclusionsThe observed increase in people seeking advice with psychological problems was minor and bore no resemblance to the reported increase in mental health problems in the UK population since the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no evidence that GPs are detecting and referring more patients with psychological problems affecting work performance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersOccupational HealthOccupational Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42263173
PMCPMC13557210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.