ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2026
Laparoscopic Methylene Blue Photodynamic Therapy for Intraabdominal Infection: A Preclinical Feasibility Study in a Rabbit Model of Perforated Appendicitis.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Methylene Blue Photodynamic Therapy for Intraabdominal Infection: A Preclinical Feasibility Study in a Rabbit Model of Perforated Appendicitis.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPerforated appendicitis commonly results in intra-abdominal infection requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy. Intraoperative antimicrobial adjuncts are limited, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) may provide a targeted, resistance-independent approach. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and preliminary antimicrobial effects of laparoscopic methylene blue photodynamic therapy (MB-PDT) for intra-abdominal disinfection in a rabbit model of perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsNew Zealand White rabbits (n = 19) underwent surgically induced perforated appendicitis via appendiceal ligation and electrocautery perforation. Animals subsequently received laparoscopic MB-PDT (n = 9) or control treatment (methylene blue lavage without laser illumination; n = 10) 24-40 h after perforation. MB-PDT consisted of peritoneal lavage with methylene blue (300 µg/mL) followed by 665-nm laser illumination at 20 mW/cm
resultsFourteen rabbits developed peritonitis, and 10 animals completed follow-up (PDT n = 7, control n = 3). Laparoscopic MB-PDT delivery was technically feasible and no histologic evidence of off-target photodynamic injury to abdominal organs was identified. Changes in bacterial burden were not significantly different between MB-PDT and control animals (p = 0.18). Body temperature showed a non-significant trend toward reduction following MB-PDT (-0.37°C ± 1.32°C) compared with controls (0.26°C ± 0.76°C; p = 0.27). In vitro MB-PDT produced significant reductions in bacterial burden across all isolated species (p < 0.001), with the most resistant Gram-positive isolate, Enterococcus faecalis, demonstrating greater susceptibility than Gram-negative species.
conclusionLaparoscopic MB-PDT was technically feasible and safe in a rabbit model of perforated appendicitis. Although a reduction in bacterial burden was not observed in vivo, MB-PDT produced strong antimicrobial activity in vitro against all bacterial species isolated from infected animals. These findings establish a preclinical technical platform for intra-abdominal MB-PDT and highlight the importance of optimized light-delivery strategies for future translational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.