Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263140›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026

Invasive Assessment of Right Ventricular Dysfunction Predicts Periprocedural Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Unplanned Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.

Tess Calcagno, Sai Prasad Ramachandran, V Karthik, Mendpara Vaidehi, Andrew Cesmat, Joseph Sipko, Bryan Baranowski, Mandeep Bhargava, Thomas D Callahan, Mina K Chung and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Tess CalcagnoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4087-3901
Sai Prasad RamachandranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
V KarthikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mendpara VaidehiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Andrew CesmatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Joseph SipkoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bryan BaranowskiSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mandeep BhargavaSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Thomas D CallahanSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mina K ChungSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Thomas DresingSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ayman A HusseinSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mohamed KanjSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Arshneel KocharSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David O MartinSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Walid I SalibaSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Tyler L TaigenSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Niraj VarmaSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Koji HiguchiSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Justin Z LeeSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Oussama M WazniSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Andres Carmona RubioSection of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Pasquale SantangeliSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jakub SroubekSection of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-5106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification in patients undergoing urgent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is limited, particularly regarding right ventricular dysfunction, which is often underrecognized in this setting.

objectivesWe investigated whether the right atrial pressure (RAP) to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio or pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) predicts short-term outcomes following urgent VT ablation.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 consecutive patients who underwent unplanned inpatient VT ablation and had right heart catheterization (RHC) within the preceding 12 months. All were admitted with recurrent VT; 67 (66%) had VT storm. Hemodynamic stratification was performed using two established indices of right-sided function: RAP:PCWP > 0.6 versus ≤ 0.6 and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) < 2 versus ≥ 2, calculated as (pulmonary artery systolic pressure - pulmonary artery diastolic pressure)/right atrial pressure. Outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), intraprocedural hemodynamic instability, 30-day VT recurrence, 30-day mortality/LVAD/transplant, delayed extubation, postoperative length of stay > 7 days, and same-day complications. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, LVEF, NYHA class, ischemic cardiomyopathy, RHC type, and moderate-to-severe MR/TR.

resultsThe cohort was 88% male, mean age 64 ± 11.9 years; 47% had LVEF < 25%, and 58% NYHA III-IV symptoms. RAP:PCWP > 0.6 was independently associated with higher risk of AKI (OR 10.4, 95% CI 2.4-14.1, p = 0.002) and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.5-16.3, p = 0.050). Age > 60 also predicted AKI (OR 12.8, 95% CI 1.3-21.3). PAPi < 2 and LVEF < 25% were not associated with adverse outcomes.

conclusionAmong urgent VT ablation patients, elevated RAP:PCWP, but not PAPi, identifies those at increased risk for AKI and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability. Incorporating RAP:PCWP into preprocedural assessment may enhance risk stratification.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCatheter AblationPulmonary ArteryTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Dysfunction, RightVentricular Function, RightAgedAtrial PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary Wedge PressurePulsatile FlowRecurrenceacute kidney injuryhemodynamic instabilitypulmonary artery pulsatility indexRAP:PCWP ratioright heart catheterizationventricular tachycardia ablation

Identifiers

PMID42263140
PMCPMC13475271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.