Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263133›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Cognition does not automatically influence perception: Evidence from neural encoding of colors belonging to different categories.

Jasna Martinovic, Alexey A Delov, Jana Tomastikova, Joel T Martin, Galina V Paramei, Yulia A Griber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cognition does not automatically influence perception: Evidence from neural encoding of colors belonging to different categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasna MartinovicDepartment of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-2577
Alexey A DelovDepartment of Sociology and Philosophy, Smolensk State University, Smolensk 214000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8589-8523
Jana TomastikovaDepartment of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Joel T MartinDepartment of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4475-3835
Galina V ParameiSchool of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool L16 9JD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-253X
Yulia A GriberDepartment of Sociology and Philosophy, Smolensk State University, Smolensk 214000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-5928

Funding

Experimental Psychology Society (EPS) EPS Undergraduate Research Bursary schemeRoyal Society (The Royal Society) IES\R1\211024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The firmest evidence in favor of models that posit early high-level influences of cognition on perception comes from electroencephalography (EEG). Enhanced early, preattentive processing of light and dark blue feature changes compared to light and dark green changes was reported in Greek speakers, who have two basic terms for "blue" (

Indexed as

CognitionColor PerceptionAdultColorElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulationcategorical perceptioncognitioncolorEEGWhorfianism

Identifiers

PMID42263133
PMCPMC13273331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.