ArticlePloS one2026
Indirect state-level estimation of sexual minority adolescent populations by sex, age, and race/ethnicity using random forests.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEstimating population sizes of adolescents who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) is important for addressing health needs and disparities. Most states have Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS) among high school students, but not all include an item about sexual identity. This study's aim was to estimate the percentages of students identifying as LGB stratified by sex, age, and race and ethnicity where state data is incomplete. States where 2021 YRBS data are not available are outside the scope of this study.
methodsWe developed two random forests trained separately for each sex and evaluated the models' performance in predicting percentages of respondents identifying as LGB by state and demographic strata. We then estimated percentages for states that did not include or have responses to the LGB identity question available in 2021.
resultsThe random forests outperformed benchmark comparison models based on a simple logistic regression approach. Estimates of students who identify as LGB across demographic strata and states ranged 5%-30%. The estimated percentages for states that did not ask students about sexual identity fell within the same range.
conclusionOur approach to deriving state-level estimates of LGB students by sex, race and ethnicity, and age performs well and can be used to inform efforts to improve health and well-being of LGB youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.