Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

What do youth need to know about puberty? A scoping review protocol to identify puberty education competencies.

Marie A Brault, Nanki Singh, Nikita Kakkad, Melissa Peskin, Anthony Betori, Gregory Laynor, Emily Naiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie A BraultInstitute for Excellence in Health Equity, Section for Global Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-785X
Nanki SinghInstitute for Excellence in Health Equity, Section for Global Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7476-0458
Nikita KakkadNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8217-4458
Melissa PeskinDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Anthony BetoriHealthy Futures of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0586-273X
Gregory LaynorHealth Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-4051
Emily NaiserPublic Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-2095

Funding

Engaging providers, community members, and young women to adapt and pilot a youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health package in low-income communities in IndiaK01TW011480 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRAULT, MARIE AMANDA · 2020 to 2023
$591k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW011480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPuberty is a key transition point in adolescents' lives that plays a foundational role in shaping health behaviors and outcomes across one's life course. This period holds significant potential to empower adolescents and support autonomy in health and well-being, but limited puberty education curricula exist for early adolescents (age 8-14), and those that do exist vary in content. There is a paucity of evaluations of puberty competencies and limited consensus on what competencies should be measured to assess effectiveness or even how to measure these competencies.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to systematically map and characterize the outcomes, domains, and instruments used to evaluate puberty education curricula for early adolescents aged 8-14 years. In accordance with PRISMA-ScR and JBI scoping review guidance, this review does not synthesize effect sizes or assess intervention efficacy, but maps the breadth of evidence to identify conceptual gaps and inform future framework development.

methodsThe review protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). We will search PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, ERIC, Education Source, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and OpenAlex for relevant sources. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract studies that meet inclusion criteria using our data extraction tool. EXPECTED OUTPUTS: Findings from the scoping review will be synthesized to create an overarching framework that can guide approaches to the development and evaluation of puberty curricula targeted to early adolescents. Focus group discussions with adolescents, parents, and school representatives will be conducted to assess the applicability and appropriateness of identified competencies and evaluation measures prior to broader dissemination. Insights from this scoping review will ultimately be used to inform the implementation and evaluation of puberty education.

Indexed as

PubertyAdolescentChildCurriculumFemaleHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42263087
PMCPMC13249200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.