ArticlePloS one2026
Compounded environmental health risks in mountain communities upstream of Bhumibol Dam, Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndigenous, mountain communities residing upstream of Bhumibol Dam, Thailand, rely on vulnerable natural water sources for their water supply, yet remain unaware of the associated health risks.
methodsThis study assessed the water quality, usage patterns, and contamination pathways across six villages upstream of Bhumibol Dam to shed light on the obstacles to sustainable water security. Samples from 38 water sources of drinking and/or non-drinking water, soil, and the edible parts of crops were subjected to analyses of physical, chemical (NO3-N, pH), and qualitative pesticide-related variables, alongside a 6-month assessment of a community water filter system.
resultsPrincipal component analysis identified a "at-risk group" of preferred drinking water sources all exhibiting high NO3-N, highly alkaline pH, and substantial pesticide contamination, which was found to likely be caused by agricultural run-off. This was reinforced by the detection of pesticide residues in all soil samples and, critically, in the below-ground edible parts of crops (taro, lemongrass, arrowroot), confirming dietary exposure in the local communities. Further compounding the risks posed by the unsafe water supply, the community water filter was found to be ineffective throughout the 6-month analysis with there being no significant difference in water quality between before and after filtration. The residents' paradoxical preference for high-risk, still water (from sand-filtered puddles) for drinking, rather than water from flowing sources, which they used only for cooking and cleaning.
conclusionOverall, these findings reveal compounded environmental health risks emerging from the convergence of mineral-rich hydrogeology, agrochemical runoff, and vulnerable water-collection behaviours. To mitigate these threats, the study suggests that decentralized water management strategies must prioritize both the implementation of advanced filtration technologies capable of mineral and chemical removal and targeted public health education to shift community reliance away from high-risk, stagnant water sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.